Re: a teacher in trouble, reply to Nathan
Michael Hirsch wrote:
On 3/4/06, Doug Henwood <dhenwood@panix.comdhenwood@panix.com> wrote:
It’s a polemical reduction, of course, but it’s pretty broadly applicable, don’t you think? Which is pretty good for a theory
It doesn’t matter what I think or you think in this case, but what Fitch thinks, and he’s proclaimed no “law” that says unions by definition care only about dues.
He said almost exactly those words to me on the phone a week or two ago.
Doug