Re: Churchill, COINTELPRO, and the 2nd investigation
On May 27, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Aaron Shuman wrote:
So to the people on this list who want to micro-analyze WC’s footnotes, is a solution to come up with a Left list of bad right-wing professors (a la David Horowitz’s hit list) and go after their footnotes? Or to reject politically-launched investigations to begin with?
Just who are “we” and how do “we” do this “rejecting”? “They” control
universities and the media, and that’s not going to change any time
soon. So “we” had better assume that they are going to micro-analyze
our footnotes (if they bother to look), and make sure they’re as
solid as possible. Unless you think the point is just to talk among
ourselves and give up on the idea of persuading anyone else.
Doug