Re: Fwd: Unions Endorsing HR 676, Single Payer Health Care
On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:27 PM, Auguste Blanqui wrote:
The thinking of people like Stern is that such laws will make the
costs (rising as they always are) increasingly annoying for
employers like W-M, and that in what may be one of the strangest
cases of bedfellowism ever, they will lobby for national health
insurance out of economic self-interest.
As the article says (and as Adolph Reed pointed out when I talked
with him the other day), it’s not likely to be a single-payer bill,
but something like the Massachusetts plan, which is a fraud.
Doug