Re: re: unbeleivably dishonest attack on adolph reed
On Jul 14, 2006, at 6:20 PM, MICHAEL YATES wrote:
I guess you can say anything on the internet. But the heading of
A. Blanqui’s message to the list is remarkable. No chapter, no
verse. Just a smear headline and a web link. Is Blanqui really M.
Pugliese?
Can’t you tell from the formatting that he isn’t?
I’ve got to say that’s a deeply unfair characterization of Reed’s
work. Perhaps it’s a response to Reed’s critique of Roediger (see the
paper at http://soc.qc.cuny.edu/jordan/), but Roediger’s Reed is
not the Reed I know.
Doug