how Hillary could win
New York Daily News - July 17, 2006
Hil’s keys to the Oval Office
By FRANK LUNTZ
For all those Republicans and a few Democrats who think Hillary
Clinton can’t possibly be elected President, I have two words for
you: Ronald Reagan.
I remember it well. He was too old. He was too conservative. He was
too scary. And he was elected in two landslides. The exact same kinds
of assumptions about electability 25 years ago are alive and well in
2006, and they are just as wrong for Hillary Clinton today as they
were for Reagan in 1979.
She’s too divisive. Too calculating. Too marred by the Clinton years.
Oh, - and she’s a woman.
Never mind the chatter. Hillary Clinton sits atop many polls for
President with good reason and, if she plays her cards right, she
could remain there right through November 2008.
Why? Because her intelligence, assertiveness, personality and
celebrity are powerful strengths. I know this for a fact. My firm has
conducted extensive focus-group research in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Now, for me to map out a road map to the White House for the most
polarizing Democrat in America is like Jack Kevorkian hosting a
reception for the AARP. But who am I to turn down a request to take
part in a fascinating political exercise?
So, here goes. Here’s how Hillary can continue to lead the pack, and
the four essential steps she needs to take to stay on top.
First, she must be herself. Her recent tack to the right - from
equivocating on the Iraq war, to supporting a ban on flag burning -
is fooling no one and is seriously agitating her liberal base. The
reason Hillary became so popular in the first place was her
unflinching willingness to tell it like it is. She must say what she
means, and mean what she says.
Similarly, recent efforts by Clinton to inject religious references
into her speeches to prove she’s a person of faith is like
fingernails on a chalkboard to Democrat primary voters. Clinton must
win the primary first - then worry about the general election. If
Democrats really cared about religion, they’d be Republicans.
Second, Clinton must give us answers, not just criticism. She is
already applauded by most voters for her focus and determination and
does a good job explaining the specifics (and even the minutiae) of
the issues she cares about. None of that should change.
But she spends so much time criticizing the Republicans that voters
aren’t hearing enough of what she would do instead. If Clinton can
modulate that overly negative tone, she will bolster her chances.
Democrats already know what they don’t like about Republicans. They
expect Clinton to prove to them that she can, and will, undo all the
“damage” that has been done. So, she should write another book that
outlines a positive vision for the future. Give voters the
alternative to Bush’s America - in writing.
Third, Clinton, who can be charming and funny in private, should be
more candid and unpredictable. She should tell voters something new
every now and then to give them a reason to listen. A been there,
done that campaign approach won’t sell in an age of 24-hour news
coverage.
A good joke - even one made at her own expense - wouldn’t hurt.
Fourth, Clinton needs to remember to speak from her heart, not her
head. Right now, she sometimes sounds like Al Gore … without the
pizzazz. Successful Republicans think. Successful Democrats - like
Bill Clinton - feel. Hillary should lower her decibel level, making
voters strain to hear her. The softer she is, the more emotional she
will sound.
Unlike the other candidates vying for the Democratic nomination,
Hillary Clinton has genuine star power. She clearly delivers the
brains and the intensity, but there are a number of verbal and visual
miscues that could undermine her presentation, her image and,
eventually, her support. She must realize, as Reagan did, that she is
more than just a messenger. She is the message.
Luntz polled for Rudy Giuliani in 1993, 1997 and 2000. He is the
author of “Words that Work: It’s Not What You Say, It’s What People
Hear.”