Re: Re: why is tikkun/ david horowitz? PS
On Jul 23, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Aaron Shuman wrote:
You don’t object to running the Horowitz piece, and if Michael Lerner decided to do a running weekly “Understanding Israel in Gaza and Lebanon” post with Horowitz as a regular commentator (or someone else) for re-making the Middle East by taking the war to Syria and Iran, you’d have no objection to that?
I’m not Joel, so I won’t answer that, but I am mystified why Lerner
would want to run anything by a hitman and hack like Horowitz. I
could see running smart right-wing pieces - I’d have no trouble with,
oh, Cordesman or Luttwak. But Horowitz? Is it some nostalgia for
Berkeley almost 40 years ago?
Doug