Re: where have all the protesters gone?

[sorry this got accidentally trashed]

From: Aaron Shuman maruta_us@yahoo.com Date: September 10, 2006 11:45:41 AM EDT To: lbo-talk@lbo-talk.org Subject: Re: where have all the protesters gone?

AS: Here are some speculations to provoke discussion…

  1. Katrina solidarity work brigades in New Orleans (and the failure
    of the anti-war movement to link with this movement in a substantive
    way that changes policy is one of the biggest failures of the past
    year);

  2. Decentralization is a drawback. (The last time there was a major
    anti-war mobilization in San Francisco, I remember press coverage
    emphasizing how even in the burbs of Walnut Creek et. al., there were
    anti-war rallies and how wonderful it all was. And that made me think
    that people are treating mobilizations as pep rallies, opportunities
    to voice their previously held opinions, rather than actually change
    the course of the war. The leadership and the unified national co- ordination to do something from the Vietnam era like surround the
    Pentagon does not seem to exist.)

  3. Emphasis on mobilizing, not mass arrests. (It feels like I’m
    getting an email every other week from another organization having an
    anti-war rally, and no one–with one exception; see below–is talking
    about civil disobedience. People are doing time all over the U.S.
    for protesting the war, but this does not seem to be built in to the
    awareness of the mainstream anti-war movement and it does not get
    mentioned nearly enough.)

  4. U.S. liberals and imperialism. (I wonder how many liberals belive
    Gore would not have invaded Iraq and so don’t see this as their war.
    Venting spleen at the Bush Administration takes the place of
    substantive anti-war action, and perhaps some are perfectly content
    to watch the B.A. take it on the chin, believing that it will help
    the Democrats return to power and–manage the war better?)

  5. “Anti-terrorism” prosecutions, police infiltration and harassment,
    are no joke. See the Northern California ACLU’s report on “the state
    of surveillance”, for instance. http://www.aclunc.org/ surveillance_report/index.html

All of the above said, school is back in session, and we’ll see what
the old-school pacifists pull off the week of September 21st with
their Declaration of Peace. http://www.declarationofpeace.org They’re
putting the emphasis back on taking action as well as talking…

The Declaration of Peace is a nationwide campaign to establish by
September 21, 2006 a concrete and rapid plan for peace in Iraq,
including: a prompt timetable for withdrawal of troops and closure of
bases a peace process for security, reconstruction, and
reconciliation and the shift of funding for war to meeting human needs.

If this plan for peace is not created and activated by Congress by
September 21, the International Day of Peace, Declaration signers
across the U.S. will engage in nonviolent action in Washington, D.C.
and in communities throughout the nation.

Even the New York Times bemoans the absence of an anti-war
movement. :-0 — Yoshie

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0831-21.htm Published on
Thursday, August 31, 2006 by the New York Times There Is Silence in
the Streets; Where Have All the Protesters Gone? by Andrew Rosenthal

Leave a Reply