Re: art’s objectivity (tangent on faulkner thread)
On Oct 1, 2006, at 4:23 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:
“Once upon a time there came to be left altogether to himself the one who came to see him too and very likely they did exchange
saying who could have been made to look as well and as often as they had occasionally wished it to be by themselves.” (Chapter CLXXI, p. 147 Dalkey edition) How could anyone not joy in that?
Could we have more of this, and less sneering about people’s
“incoherence” and “bad faith”?
Doug