Re: More on How Lamont Blew It
On Oct 11, 2006, at 11:45 PM, ravi wrote:
At around 11/10/06 9:33 pm, mike larkin wrote:
http://nationaljournal.com/todd.htm => Lieberman seems to be framing the debate and appears to have the momentum.
Zogby 09/25 => Joe 53, Ned 33 Rasmussen 10/03 => Joe 51, Ned 40 Uconn 10/04 => Joe 48, Ned 40 SurveUSA 10/08 => Joe 53, Ned 40 Courant 10/10 => Joe 48, Ned 40
This should fit right into our mathematics/innumeracy thread.
Not sure what your point is here - is it that Lieberman’s lead is
narrowing? But you’re comparing five polls from five different
pollsters, blithely ignoring what the profession calls the “house
effect.” If you’re doing comparisons over time, use the same pollster.
Doug