freedom of the press

Los Angeles Times - March 19, 2007

prezmedia19mar19,0,5330698,full.story>

News media and politics: an uneasy union Some prominent journalists have mates who work for a presidential =

candidate. They approach this potential conflict in different ways. By James Rainey, Times Staff Writer

Some of America’s most prominent political journalists are, quite =

literally, wedded to the 2008 presidential race: Their spouses work =

for one of the candidates.

Relationships that cross the media-political divide raise ethical =

questions for the journalists and their employers. Should the =

potential conflict of interest merely be disclosed to readers or =

viewers? Or should the journalists be shifted to new assignments to =

lessen the appearance their motives might be divided?

Heading into the presidential election year, the answers to those =

questions have been markedly different for at least four journalists:

  • Los Angeles Times political reporter Ronald Brownstein recently =

began a new assignment as a columnist for the newspaper’s opinion and =

editorial pages after his bosses banned him from writing news stories =

about the presidential race. The Times was seeking to avoid the =

appearance of a conflict: Brownstein is married to Eileen McMenamin, =

chief spokeswoman for Sen. John McCain, a candidate for the =

Republican nomination.

  • Matthew Cooper, the former Time magazine correspondent who was a =

witness in the recent trial of former vice presidential aide I. Lewis =

“Scooter” Libby, says he hasn’t figured out exactly how to cope with =

the fact that his wife, Mandy Grunwald, is a chief ad strategist in =

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaign for the Democratic nomination. =

Now Washington editor for Portfolio magazine, Cooper said he expects =

to write about Clinton and “to acknowledge my wife works for =

Hillary … at least on Hillary-centric stories.”

  • Nina Easton, Fortune magazine Washington bureau chief and Fox News =

analyst, said she would not write stories centering on McCain’s =

campaign, because her husband, Russ Schriefer, is plotting media =

strategy for McCain. When appearing on Fox, she said, she plans at =

least occasional disclaimers to tell TV viewers she is married to a =

McCain advisor.

  • NBC’s Campbell Brown will continue to cover politics after her =

husband rejected overtures to join the campaign of former =

Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican presidential candidate. =

Dan Senor, a former White House aide and once top spokesman for the =

Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, opted to start a private =

firm, partly so his wife would not face a conflict.

Journalism critics say the public’s skepticism toward the media has =

been heightened by recent events, particularly the Libby trial, which =

revealed a cozy relationship between Washington journalists and their =

sources.

“I think at the minimum you should state the relationship in each =

report, and then think about recusing yourself entirely,” said Joseph =

Tuman, a professor of political communication at San Francisco State =

University who has himself disclosed potential conflicts as a =

television commentator.

Tom Rosenstiel, a former Washington correspondent for Newsweek =

magazine and The Times, said that in many cases, disclosure was not =

enough.

“You have the right to marry anyone you want, but you don’t have the =

right to cover any beat you want,” said Rosenstiel, now director of =

the Project for Excellence in Journalism.

Though they agreed that they needed to address the doubts of a =

skeptical public, the media-political couples said they got little, =

if any, professional benefit from their marriages. All said they were =

careful not to share trade secrets.

“There is a lot of stuff she doesn’t tell me and a lot of stuff that =

I don’t tell her,” Cooper said of Grunwald, the Clinton advisor.

Easton of Fortune and Fox News agreed, saying that journalists and =

their spouses zealously protected their reputations. “We all =

understand there are things we just can’t share,” said Easton, a =

former Times and Boston Globe journalist. Schriefer “has clients, and =

he is responsible to them. And I am responsible to readers and =

viewers and to my editors and producers. We both understand that.”

Schriefer said the couple simply would rather talk about topics other =

than politics, such as “the kids, our next vacation or what movie we =

want to see.” He said they couldn’t really worry about “people who =

believe in conspiracy theories. They can always find something to =

complain about.”

Still, Easton agreed in an interview that public disclosure of =

potential conflicts was important. After speaking to The Times, she =

made her first on-air comment about her husband’s job.

“In full disclosure, my husband works for the McCain campaign,” she =

said on the “Fox News Sunday” round table, “so take what I say with a =

grain of salt.”

Official Washington is a small world, where elected officials, =

political operatives, lobbyists and journalists fraternize and =

sometimes become intimate.

Among the pairings that once spanned the media-government boundary: =

NBC News correspondent Andrea Mitchell and former Federal Reserve =

Chairman Alan Greenspan; and former New York Times correspondent Todd =

Purdum and Dee Dee Myers, previously chief spokeswoman for President =

Clinton. Brownstein and Easton were once married to each other, and =

the current spouse of each is now a McCain operative.

The journalists all answered questions, if sometimes =

unenthusiastically, about the collision of their personal and =

political lives.

Perhaps that’s because the attention the unions draw is unlikely to =

be positive. In May 2005, for example, a blogger wrote that =

Brownstein’s marriage to the McCain aide created an “obvious conflict =

of interest.”

A couple of weeks later, Brownstein acknowledged the marriage at the =

bottom of his regular Washington Outlook column and added: “I am =

confident that her new job will not affect my judgments, pro and con, =

about McCain and his initiatives.”

But Times editors decided that mere disclosure would not be enough =

come the 2008 race, in which McCain is expected to be a prime =

contender. Then-Editor Dean Baquet and Managing Editor Douglas Frantz =

decided they would take a stronger stand =97 prohibiting Brownstein =

from covering the 2008 presidential race.

Frantz said in an interview that he was sure Brownstein could “set =

aside his personal situation and write fairly…. But the appearance =

of a conflict was too stark to consider any sort of role for him in =

covering the presidential race.”

The ban did not draw much public attention because Brownstein =97 a two- =

time Pulitzer Prize finalist =97 was on leave writing a book.

When he returned, the veteran commentator, who also appears on CNN, =

had hoped to at least write about the Democratic contenders. “I saw =

the concern they had,” the reporter said of his bosses, “but it =

seemed to me to be a very high standard that they were setting.”

Brownstein said he adjusted to the idea of focusing on Congress and =

President Bush =97 and sitting on the sidelines after covering six =

straight presidential elections. But his role in news coverage became =

moot late last month, when Times Publisher David Hiller announced =

that Brownstein would write a weekly political column and other =

pieces for the paper’s op-ed operation.

Andres Martinez, editor of The Times’ opinion pages, said in a =

statement that he was “thrilled” to have Brownstein on his staff. But =

he added in an interview that the reassignment did not completely =

extinguish the conflict issue.

Martinez plans to have other writers take on the bulk of commentary =

focused on McCain. Brownstein will be able to write columns in which =

the senator is less central, Martinez said. In those cases, he said, =

“we will err on the side of full disclosure” of Brownstein’s marriage.

Leave a Reply