Obama: proud to be an American…

foreign-policy-address.html>

=AB Bloomberg Outraged at Omnibus Bills | Main | Giuliani’s First =

Quarter =BB

Obama to Deliver Major Foreign Policy Address FILE UNDER: Barack Obama Barack Obama is planning to deliver an important foreign policy =

speech on Tuesday, aides to Obama just told me.

The speech is going to be billed as a comprehensive, substantive =

proposal for improving American’s damaged international standing and =

fortifying its security by dealing more proactively with failed states.

I got to talk a little bit about it with Samantha Power, a Pulitzer =

Prize-winning author on the subject of genocide and an informal =

advisor to Mr. Obama’s campaign who is helping to write the speech.

“We’re going to hear something very unusual on the left, which is a =

genuine pride in what America can be again,” she told me. “It’s a =

bigger story about failing states. It’s not a regional story. It’s =

more freedom from fear and freedom from war.”

Drafts of the speech, she said, call for a return to “legitimacy and =

competence” as the two pillars upon which America should rebuild its =

standing in the world and fortify its national security.

Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton confirmed that the speech would =

be delivered on Tuesday, but made a point to say that it was but one =

of many major policy addresses in the works.

Another of Obama’s foreign policy advisors said that the speech will =

“lay out his vision of where American leadership needs to take the =

country in the 21st century to protect its interests and the American =

people.”

The speech will also deal with “priorities,” said the advisor, who =

said it would “start with Iraq and go from there.”

The advisor added that the vision is “uniquely Obama and can be said =

by Obama.” The point, the advisor said, is to demonstrate that “Obama =

has a uniquely international background. He is American first and is =

proud of America and is proud of what only America can do.”

Power has been advising Obama on foreign policy since the campaign =

started, and worked in his Senate office as what she called a “big =

think” role between 2005 and 2006 as part of a Council on Foreign =

Relations fellowship. Talking about the speech, she told me that =

drafts of the upcoming speech reflect Obama’s “alluring pragmatism,” =

and added that it would be followed by several, more detailed =

addresses on how to deal with specific challenges, including failed =

states and nuclear proliferation.

Drafts of the major address, which Power was working on with Obama’s =

foreign policy team and his chief speechwriter, Jon Favreau, argue =

that “respect” is the essential currency in conducting effective =

foreign policy, and that the foreign policy blunders and =

embarrassments of the Bush administration have weakened the nation’s =

hand in influencing world affairs.

“When he talks about restoring American’s standing in the world,” =

Power said, “it’s born of a very clear-eyed, almost cold =

understanding that in these international bodies we will not get what =

we want — we will not get the solutions we need if we do not have =

respect.”

Ms. Power said that drafts of the speech make the case that national =

security will be strengthened by a greater respect for America in =

“Africa, where people join rebel movements, and in countries where =

people are joining terrorist groups.”

Power also contrasted what she said was Obama’s effort to look =

forward with the foreign policy attitudes of his Democratic rivals =

John Edwards and Hillary Clinton, who she suggested was stuck in a =

1990s view of the world, when American influence was much greater.

“Edwards is less prone to this than Hillary,” she said, adding “Let’s =

be clear, those tools that we got away with by the skin of our teeth =

are not the tools that are going to work in the 21st century.”

While many of the Democratic candidates, and especially Mr. Edwards, =

have made a restoration of international respect for American a =

lynchpin of their foreign policy philosophies, Power argued that =

Obama was the only candidate who intended to use the respect as an =

instrument of change.

The other candidates, Power said, called for “respect for respect’s =

sake.”

Obama, who was a state Senator from Illinois two years ago, has been =

the subject of criticism from rival campaigns about his inexperience =

on foreign policy matters. The series of policy addresses, =

presumably, represents an effort to put those concerns to rest.

– Jason Horowitz

UPDATE: Samantha Power asked me to clarify that her comments about =

Clinton and Edwards are her personal opinion as a professor of US =

foreign policy, and that she was not speaking in her capacity as an =

advisor to the Obama campaign.

Leave a Reply