Greer blasts Diana

Daily Mail (London) - July 27, 2007 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=471204&in_page_id=1770&ct=5

Diana was ‘devious, slow and disturbingly neurotic,’ mocks Germaine
Greer

Feminist Germaine Greer has caused outrage in Australia for calling
the late Princess of Wales, “slow”, “devious” and “disturbingly
neurotic”.

The controversial academic claims Diana is partly responsible for the
car accident that killed her almost a decade ago - by initiating a
love triangle between herself, Dodi Fayed and heart surgeon Hasnat Khan.

“The saddest thought of all is that Diana’s death may have resulted
indirectly from another of her kack-handed manipulations; it is said
that she only went to Paris with (her late lover) Dodi Fayed in order
to make heart surgeon Hasnat Khan jealous,” writes Greer in an essay
published in Weekend Australian Magazine.

Diana was 36 when she was killed along with Fayed and chauffeur Henri
Paul when their Mercedes crashed in the Pont de l’Alma tunnel in
Paris in August 31, 1997.

Former Celebrity Big Brother contestant Greer further ridicules
Diana’s intelligence, referring to her childhood nickname of ‘Brian’
which her siblings called her - “after the dopey snail on The Magic
Roundabout on children’s TV.

Feminist Germaine Greer is scathing about the late Princess of Wales

“Of the four Spencer children, Diana was the slowest. Because of her
slowness, she was easily found out in her preposterous fibs.”

The former Celebrity Big Brother contestant takes another episode
from Diana’s childhood to illustrate her “devious” nature, when she
allegedly persuaded a younger school friend to write a poison pen
letter to her father’s second wife (Lady Raine Spencer).

“Apparently she didn’t have the courage to write her own letter…in
adulthood Diana became more, rather than less devious.

“The same foolhardiness was at work not only in Diana’s sexual
adventures but also in her orchestration of her public persona,” says
Greer.

As for Diana’s fashion icon status, Greer dismisses her ‘nondescript’
sartorial choices as comparable to that of female TV newsreaders.

“Diana was never a fashion icon; she dressed to the same demotic
standard of elegance as TV anchorwomen do, plus the inevitable hat.

“It is precisely because she was basically anonymous that Diana’s
public could so easily identify her.”

Lastly, Greer dismisses Diana’s ‘Queen of Hearts’ reputation and
accuses her of “rushing into too many situations in which genuine
angels would have feared to tread”.

“Her habit of popping up in the midst of other people’s life crises
must have startled some of her victims.

“Diana’s legacy is no more than endless column inches of adulation
and speculation,” adds Greer.

Leave a Reply