forget the mess in Iraq - let’s bash MoveOn!
[from The Note]
We all knew yesterday would mark a turning point in the politics of
the Iraq war — and this is no time to envy the Republicans. But all
it took was a newspaper ad (and one particularly poor pun) to make
Democrats squirm, at the very time the party needs unity the most.
Republicans’ rallying point actually had little to do with the long-
awaited report to Congress by Gen. David Petraeus. Moveon.org’s ad in
yesterday’s New York Times was meant to help Democrats make a case
against Petraeus’ recommendations, but the play on his name (”General
Betray Us?”) backfired by letting Republicans take the offensive –
and they unloaded in unison.
The ad allowed White House allies to “change the subject from the
progress in Iraq to the rhetoric used by war opponents,” ABC’s Jake
Tapper reports. “By the end of the day, 30 Republican senators and
Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., had written to the Democratic Senate
Leader, asking him to ‘join us in making it clear that you do not
share the views of Moveon.org, and that you will not join Moveon.org
in attacking the character of this fine officer,’ and House
Republicans had introduced a resolution condemning the ad.”
A day that many Republicans on Capitol Hill dreaded went better than
the GOP could have planned, as Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker
more than held their own. “As the day unfolded, Congressional
Republicans seemed increasingly pleased by the course of the events,
saying that Democrats seemed unable to poke many holes in the
testimony,” writes The New York Times’ Carl Hulse. “To them it was a
welcome respite from weeks of party division over the war, not to
mention days of turmoil over the personal conduct of Senator Larry E.
Craig.”
Petraeus’ testimony makes it likely that the next president will
inherit a situation where more than 100,000 US troops will remain in
Iraq in January 2009, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos said on “Good
Morning America.” “He did what the president needed him to do,”
Stephanopoulos said. “He bought time.”
Writes Dana Milbank of The Washington Post: “Though trying to punt
until March a decision about major troop reductions, he leavened his
remarks with soothing phrases such as ‘I have recommended a drawdown
of the surge forces from Iraq’ and ‘Force reductions will continue
beyond the pre-surge levels.’ “
Do not mistake a news cycle or two — or the impact of any single ad,
as juvenile as Moveon.org’s was — for a tectonic political shift.
The attacks made the GOP feel good for the day, but the substance of
Petraeus’ recommendations mean we’ll probably be back here again in
March — six months closer to the election — with the Republicans
perhaps even more conflicted over whether to continue to support the
war.
But the Moveon.org ad and its fallout provide a stark reminder of the
influence of the anti-war left, which remains — more than
Republicans — the biggest threat to Democratic unity on the war.
“The bottom line seemed clear: Majority Democrats haven’t coalesced
around a single option to brandish against the White House’s conduct
of the war,” writes Time’s Mark Thompson. “In the wake of Monday’s
hearing — and a pair slated before the Senate on Tuesday — it
appears likely that there will be no major change in U.S. policy in
Iraq until at least next spring.”
“The Iraq war now moves into a phase where the battlefield calculus
is likely to matter far less than what happens in Washington,” writes
the Chicago Tribune’s Michael Tackett. “But while the Democrats might
believe they have the stronger argument, they also face the tougher
decision of whether to vote for funding for a strategy that they have
publicly rejected.”