Doug Henwood Talks

[No mention, of course, of the blowback from the Iraq war.]

Crime rises as police fight other threats By Jason Szep 2 hours, 4 minutes ago

BOSTON (Reuters) - After a night of dancing, Chiara Levin was shot in
the head by a stray bullet from a gunfight as she sat in a Cadillac
sport utility vehicle. Hours later she was dead.

The killing of the 22-year-old Kentucky native, who recently
graduated university with honors, in a tough neighborhood in Boston’s
Dorchester district on March 24 sparked weeks of outcry in a city
where the murder rate neared a 10-year high last year.

Like Boston, many U.S. cities are struggling to stem a wave of
violent crime and murder that has raised questions of whether police
are fighting terrorism at the expense of street crime, and whether a
widening wealth gap feeds the problem.

“We’re at a tipping point in violent crime in many cities,” said
Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research
Forum, a Washington-based law enforcement think tank that released
data in March showing the murder rate rising by more than 10 percent
in dozens of big U.S. cities since 2004.

“What we’re seeing over the past 24 months is a new volatility. In
some big cities violent crime and murder are up. Some are seeing a
reduction. It’s a dramatic shift from the past 10 years when it was
mostly all decreases,” he said.

Criminologists are worried. Federal Bureau of Investigation data
shows murders and shootings hitting smaller cities and states with
little experience of serious urban violence. The last similar period
of volatility was right before the big crime wave of the 1980s and
1990s.

Explanations vary — from softer gun laws to budget cuts, fewer
police on the beat, more people in poverty, expanding gang violence
and simple complacency. But many blame a national preoccupation with
potential threats from overseas since the attacks of September 11, 2001.

“Since 9/11, police obligations have increased substantially above
and beyond decreasing street crime,” Jens Ludwig, a criminal justice
expert at Georgetown University.

“So even if police resources were held constant, there is this
growing obligation on their part, so the resources available to fight
street crime have gone down.”

POLICE ON THE BEAT

Some police departments have seen staff reduced as police officers
fight in Iraq, while resources that could be used to fight street
crime get channeled into security at airports and other transit
points seen as vulnerable after the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Jack Levin, director of the Brudnick Center on Violence and Conflict
at Northeastern University, said many U.S. cities cut programs that
emphasized prevention, community-oriented policing and controls on
the spread of guns, often citing budget cuts. Boston is now reviving
some of those ideas.

Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick announced on May 10 a $15 million
anti-crime plan to add more police as Boston grapples with 22 murders
reported this year, on pace with last year’s tally, which was one
murder shy of a 10-year high hit in 2005.

Boston stands out because it was seen as a national leader in halting
violent crime in the late 1990s, when politicians basked in what
became known as the “Boston Miracle.” Homicides collapsed 77 percent
from 1990 to 1997 and the city went for almost two years without a
homicide against anybody under 18.

“The violent crime rate started to rise again nationwide during the
recession of 2001 and 2002, when many state governments, local city
governments and the Feds cut back on their crime-fighting efforts,”
said Levin.

“In Boston, we are now putting more police on the streets in crime
hot spots and we are also increasing the number of after-school
programs and summer jobs. They are not up to the level that they were
in the middle 1990s. But we’re doing a better job than we did two
years ago,” he said.

One sign that future crime rates could worsen is an uneven economy
and frail consumer sentiment, said Richard Rosenfeld, a criminal
justice expert at University of Missouri-St. Louis.

He tracks crime rates in big U.S. cities against the Reuters/ University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers, which fell to an eight- month low in April on rising gasoline prices and troubles in the
housing market.

The index, he said, is emerging as a “comparatively potent predictor
of property crime and robbery.”

“Just as the economy is sending out mixed signals, that’s what were
getting in the crime statistics right now,” he said.

Wexler’s data at the Police Executive Research Forum, compiled from
56 police jurisdictions, showed murder up 2.89 percent in 2006,
robberies climbing 6.48 percent but aggravated assaults down 2.2
percent. Some big cities — Dallas, Denver and Washington — posted
sharp declines in murder rates.

The FBI’s latest report, in December, showed violent crime up 3.7
percent in the first six months of 2006 after gaining 2.3 percent in
2005 — the first rise in four years. Robbery, an important indicator
of crime trends, was up nearly 10 percent.

Ludwig at Georgetown blames part of the problem on cuts to former
President Bill Clinton’s signature COPS Program that put thousands of
police on the streets. Its funding fell to $102 million in fiscal
2007 from $487 million in 2004 and $1.5 billion in 1998, according to
the U.S. Conference of Mayors.

This entry was posted on Monday, May 21st, 2007 at 10:51 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.